home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
kermit.columbia.edu
/
kermit.columbia.edu.tar
/
kermit.columbia.edu
/
newsgroups
/
misc.19950528-19950726
/
000318_news@columbia.edu_Tue Jul 11 04:47:55 1995.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-07-31
|
2KB
Received: from apakabar.cc.columbia.edu by watsun.cc.columbia.edu with SMTP id AA08295
(5.65c+CU/IDA-1.4.4/HLK for <kermit.misc@watsun.cc.columbia.edu>); Tue, 11 Jul 1995 18:14:28 -0400
Received: by apakabar.cc.columbia.edu id AA29772
(5.65c+CU/IDA-1.4.4/HLK for kermit.misc@watsun); Tue, 11 Jul 1995 17:36:04 -0400
Path: news.columbia.edu!panix!news.mathworks.com!gatech!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!news.cs.utah.edu!cc.usu.edu!jrd
From: jrd@cc.usu.edu (Joe Doupnik)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Subject: Re: Kermit in ODI
Message-Id: <1995Jul11.104756.55820@cc.usu.edu>
Date: 11 Jul 95 10:47:55 MDT
References: <3tu3du$a16@usenet.srv.cis.pitt.edu>
Organization: Utah State University
Lines: 20
Apparently-To: kermit.misc@watsun.cc.columbia.edu
In article <3tu3du$a16@usenet.srv.cis.pitt.edu>, wcbst4+@pitt.edu (William C Beegle) writes:
> After spending an absurd amount of time trying to figure out why I
> couldn't get MSKermit working with LAN Workplace, I came to a realization:
> The Instructions in the /NETWORKS directory need help. All I had to do
> was modify my NET.CFG file. The setup.doc file talks about using
> different frames, but I was already using Ethernet_II. I ignored the
> other differences in the file because I expected differences between the
> sample file and my own. I got everything to work when I added the
> Protocol IP 0800 Ethernet_II
> Protocol ARP 0806 Ethernet_II
> Protocol RARP 8035 Ethernet_II
> lines to the NET.CFG file. The setup file talks about not mixing up IP
> and IPX, but I took this as a general warning to pay attention, not a
> notice to add the protocol lines from the sample.
------------
How many ways does one need to say "pay attention, follow the
rules, don't be creative here"? The examples are there for very good
reasons and are usable.
Glad you succeeded,
Joe D.